Dag Vongraven, Jon Aars, Steve Amstrup, Stephen N. Atkinson, Stanislav Belikov, Erik W. Born, Terry D. DeBruyn, Andrew E. Derocher, George Durner, Mike Gill, Nick Lunn, Martyn E. Obbard, Jack Omelak, Nikita Ovsyanikov, Elizabeth Peacock, Evan Richardson, Vicki Sahanatien, Ian Stirling, Øystein Wiig
Ursus 23 (sp2), 1-66, (1 November 2012) https://doi.org/10.2192/URSUS-D-11-00026.1
KEYWORDS: adaptive management, climate change, habitat loss, harvest, monitoring, polar bear, population parameters, population size, sea ice, traditional ecological knowledge, Ursus maritimus
Polar bears (Ursus maritimus) occupy remote regions that are characterized by harsh weather and limited access. Polar bear populations can only persist where temporal and spatial availability of sea ice provides adequate access to their marine mammal prey. Observed declines in sea ice availability will continue as long as greenhouse gas concentrations rise. At the same time, human intrusion and pollution levels in the Arctic are expected to increase. A circumpolar understanding of the cumulative impacts of current and future stressors is lacking, long-term trends are known from only a few subpopulations, and there is no globally coordinated effort to monitor effects of stressors. Here, we describe a framework for an integrated circumpolar monitoring plan to detect ongoing patterns, predict future trends, and identify the most vulnerable polar bear subpopulations. We recommend strategies for monitoring subpopulation abundance and trends, reproduction, survival, ecosystem change, human-caused mortality, human–bear conflict, prey availability, health, stature, distribution, behavioral change, and the effects that monitoring itself may have on polar bears. We assign monitoring intensity for each subpopulation through adaptive assessment of the quality of existing baseline data and research accessibility. A global perspective is achieved by recommending high intensity monitoring for at least one subpopulation in each of four major polar bear ecoregions. Collection of data on harvest, where it occurs, and remote sensing of habitat, should occur with the same intensity for all subpopulations. We outline how local traditional knowledge may most effectively be combined with the best scientific methods to provide comparable and complementary lines of evidence. We also outline how previously collected intensive monitoring data may be sub-sampled to guide future sampling frequencies and develop indirect estimates or indices of subpopulation status. Adoption of this framework will inform management and policy responses to changing worldwide polar bear status and trends.