Translator Disclaimer
1 January 2003 Phylogenetical Positions of Sorex sp. (Insectivora, Mammalia) from Cheju Island and S. caecutiens from the Korean Peninsula, Inferred from Mitochondrial Cytochrome b Gene Sequences
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Phylogenetical positions of Sorex specimens unassigned to species from Cheju Island, Korea, and S. caecutiens from southern Korean Peninsula were investigated based on full nucleotide sequences (1,140 bp) of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene, comparing specimens of the S. caecutiens/shinto group from locations throughout its range. In the phylogenetic tree obtained, S. caecutiens were separated into two main groups: Hokkaido and Continent-Sakhalin-Cheju clusters. Shrews from Cheju and Korean Peninsula were included in the latter cluster. Thus, we suggest that the shrew on Cheju Island should be ranked as S. caecutiens, although taxonomic description of the shrew has to be conducted elsewhere. The Cheju shrews formed a single sub-cluster while the peninsular shrews were not included in a single sub-cluster. The clustering of individuals in Continent-Sakhalin-Cheju cluster did not always reflect the geographical proximity of their capture locations. We interpret these findings as indicating ancestral isolation of a Hokkaido population and recent rapid range expansion of the modern population in Eurasian Continent-Sakhalin-Cheju.

INTRODUCTION

Sorex caecutiens Laxmann and S. shinto Thomas (Soricinae, Soricidae, Insectivora) form a monophyletic Sorex caecutiens/shinto group (Ohdachi et al., 1997, 2001). Sorex caecutiens is widely distributed throughout the northern part of the Eurasian Continent and neighbouring islands, including the Korean Peninsula and the islands of Hokkaido and Sakhalin (Karafuto), while extant S. shinto is known only from the islands of Honshu, Sado, and Shikoku (Ohdachi et al., 1997, 2001; Fig. 1). Fossils of S. shinto, however, have been excavated from the middle Pleistocene layers in Honshu and the late Pleistocene in Kyushu (Kawamura and Sotsuka, 1984; Kawamura et al., 1989). Thus, the ranges of S. caecutiens populations of Hokkaido and the Korean Peninsula were adjacent to that of S. shinto. Ohdachi et al. (2001) showed the unique phylogenetic position of S. caecutiens in Hokkaido, which is obviously different from those from the continent, but no samples from the Korean Peninsula had then been analyzed. It is therefore necessary to examine the phylogenetic position of S. caecutiens from the Korean Peninsula and compare it with other S. caecutiens populations and with S. shinto to understand the evolutionary process of the caecutiens/shinto group.

Fig. 1

Map of study area and range of S. caecutiens and S. shinto. Numbers correspond with those in Table 1.

i0289-0003-20-1-91-f01.gif

A Sorex shrew was recently discovered from Cheju Island (H.-S. Oh, unpubl.), but has not been assigned to species yet. Thus, it is also necessary to determine the correct phylogenetic position of shrews from Cheju, which is located between the Korean Peninsula and the Japanese Islands and is thus a key region for the investigation of bio-geographic history in East Asia. The Cheju shrew definitely belongs to the caecutiens/shinto group, judging from external and cranial morphology according to our preliminary investigation. However, it is difficult on morphological information alone to identify species or subspecies (or local populations) in the caecutiens/shinto group, because this group shows complex morphological variation between local populations and sibling species (Dokuchaev et al., 1997). In cases of doubt, genetic information can provide clarification (e.g. Vogel and Sofianidou, 1996; Ohdachi et al., 1997; Iwasa et al., 2001). Accordingly, we recently captured five specimens of the genus Sorex at a higher location (ca. 1,000 m) of Mt. Halla on Cheju Island (33° 20′ 38”N, 126° 27′ 30”E) to investigate its phylogenetic status.

In this paper, we estimated phylogenetic relationships among different populations of the caecutiens/shinto group including those from Cheju Island and the Korean Peninsula by using full nucleotide sequences (1,140 bp) of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. We then propose a taxonomic status of the shrew from Cheju Island.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Specimens and DNA analysis

Mitochondrial cytochrome b gene sequences (1,140 bp) were derived from 33 individuals of the caecutiens/shinto group from 20 locations throughout Eurasia (Table 1, Fig. 1). Of these, 17 shrews had been analyzed previously (Ohdachi et al., 2001) and the remaining 16 were analyzed for the present study. In addition, one S. isodon Turov and one S. mirabilis Ognev from South Korea were used as outgroups in phylogenetic analysis. The biological information on the shrews (sex, age, collection date, etc.) as well as the sequence data are stored in DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank data bases (accession numbers are indicated in Table 1). Sequencing method was given in Ohdachi et al. (2001).

Table 1

List of samples used in analysis. Locality numbers correspond with those of Fig. 1.

i0289-0003-20-1-91-t01.gif

Phylogenetic analysis

To infer phylogeny, maximum likelihood (ML) tree was estimated by the quartet-puzzling method (10,000 puzzling steps) using TREE-PUZZLE ver.5.0 (Strimmer and von Haeseler, 1996) based on 1,140-bp data set of mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences. According to the hierarchical likelihood ratio tests by MODELTEST ver. 3.06 (Posada and Crandall, 1998) with PAUP* ver. 4.0b10 (Swofford, 2000), the substitution model by Tamura and Nei (1993) with gamma distribution + invariable sites (TrN+G+I model) were chosen to construct an ML tree. Eight categories were used for gamma distribution (Yang 1996). Confidence of a node was assigned by a support value of quartet-puzzling (Strimmer and von Haeseler, 1996).

RESULTS

The 1,140-bp region of the cytochrome b gene was successfully sequenced for the 18 new Sorex specimens (including one S. isodon and one S. mirabilis) used in the present study. None of the sequences contained any insertions or deletions.

A phylogenetic tree was obtained by the ML method (Fig. 2). The transition/transversion parameter was estimated from the data as 10.55±1.61 SE and Y/R transition parameter was 1.37±0.24 SE. Fraction of invariable site was 0.51±0.03 SE. Gamma distribution parameter, alpha, was estimated from the data set as 0.73±0.13 SE. Total rate heterogeneity was 0.79±0.08 SE. The percentage of unresolved quartets was 21.7% and -ln L was 3841.26 (without clock).

Fig. 2

Maximum likelihood tree by Tamura and Nei (1993) substitution model with 1 invariable and 8 gamma rates of site heterogeneity, based on nucleotide sequences (1,140 bp) of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene in Sorex caecutiens and S. shinto. Numbers near internal branches indicate the support values of quartet-puzzling (%). Solid triangles denote shrews from peninsular Korea and Cheju Island.

i0289-0003-20-1-91-f02.gif

The ML tree showed that S. caecutiens and S. shinto were obviously separated, and shrews from Cheju Island were clearly included in S. caecutiens (Fig. 2). Within S. caecutiens, shrews from Hokkaido segregated unambiguously from those from the other locations (the islands of Cheju, Sakhalin, and Paramushir, and the Eurasian Continent); the former cluster is termed Hokkaido cluster and the latter Continent-Sakhalin-Cheju cluster (Fig. 2). Continent-Sakhalin-Cheju cluster in turn segregated into six subclusters: subclusters A-E and Cheju cluster. Sub-cluster A consisted of shrews from Sakhalin and locations throughout the Eurasian Continent (including Paramushir Island). Sub-cluster B consisted of shrews from southern Korean Peninsula, while one individual from Korea (Mt. Odae-3) was not included in this cluster. Sub-clusters C-E consisted mainly of shrews from northeastern continental Asia. All the shrews from Cheju Island were monophyletic (Cheju cluster), but phylogenetical relationships among those from Sakhalin-the Eurasian Continent did not always reflect the geographical proximity of their capture locations (Fig. 2).

DISCUSSION

Judging from the mitochondrial nucleotide sequences, the Sorex shrews on Cheju Island were phylogenetically allocated as S. caecutiens (Fig. 2), which is widely distributed throughout northern Eurasia (Fig. 1), and were not as S. shinto, which is endemic to the southern parts of the Japanese Islands. Thus, we suggest that the shrew on Cheju Island should be ranked as S. caecutiens, although traditional taxonomic description of the shrew has not been conducted yet since it was discovered (H.-S. Oh, unpubl.). Further, its morphological status among the caecutiens/shinto group should be investigated as the Sorex specimens from Cheju Island were distinctly larger and had relatively longer tails than those from the Korean Peninsula (unpubl.).

Shrews from peninsular Korea were clustered together with S. caecutiens from the continent and Sakhalin (Fig. 2). Thus, unlike the population of Hokkaido, the peninsular population did not have a unique phylogenetical position in S. caecutiens. Further, one sample from peninsular Korea (Mt. Odae-3) did not cluster into a single group with the other Korean shrews (Fig. 2). In contrast, four shrews from Cheju Island clustered together with a high support value (73%) in the ML tree (Fig. 2). This suggests that there is no clear demarcation between the peninsular and continental populations but that the Cheju population might have been isolated from the continental population for longer than the peninsular population.

Han et al. (in press) revealed based on mitochondrial phylogenetic investigation that there are two Crocidura species (Crocidurinae, Soricidae) (in Cheju) and proposed that one of them was introduced by humans and the other, which is a species common to the Korean Peninsula, was naturally distributed on Cheju Island. Hence, soricid fauna (Sorex and Crocidura) on Cheju Island is a part of that of the peninsula (= the continent) and was not directly influenced by the fauna of the Japanese Islands.

In Continent-Sakhalin-Cheju cluster of S. caecutiens, the ML tree showed brush-like diversification among six sub-clusters (Fig. 2), indicating the six clusters were founded almost simultaneously. Further, sub-cluster A was a main group in Continent-Sakhalin-Cheju cluster and consisted of shrews from different parts throughout Eurasia (Fig. 2). This suggests that the ancestral shrews of sub-cluster A spread throughout Eurasia in a short time that did not allow local differentiation of haplotypes, as suggested by Ohdachi et al. (2001). In contrast, the ancestor of the Hokkaido population of S. caecutiens seems to have been separated from that of Sakhalin and the continent considerably before the range expansion of these populations. The ancient separation of the Hokkaido population was also supported by Ohdachi et al. (2001) using a larger numbers of samples from Hokkaido.

Acknowledgments

We express our gratitude to the following for offering samples and/or assistance in collecting samples: H.-S. Oh, N. E. Dokuchaev, V. Haukisalmi, A. P. Kryukov, and Yu. M. Marusik. We also thank V. A. Nesterenko, M. J. Toda, A. Davis, M. A. Iwasa, and Y. Naito for reviewing an earlier manuscript. The present study was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan.

REFERENCES

1.

N. E. Dokuchaev, S. Ohdachi, and H. Abe . 1999. Morphometric status of shrews of the Sorex caecutiens/shinto group in Japan. Mammal Study 24:67–78. Google Scholar

2.

S. H. Han, M. A. Iwasa, S. D. Ohdachi, H. S. Oh, H. Suzuki, K. Tsuchiya, and H. Abe . in press. Molecular phylogeny of Crocidura shrews in northeastern Asia: a special reference to specimens on Cheju Island, South Korea. Acta Theriologica.  Google Scholar

3.

M. A. Iwasa, S. Ohdachi, S. Han, H. Oh, H. Abe, and H. Suzuki . 2001. Karyo-type and RFLP of the nuclear rDNA of Crocidura sp. on Cheju Island, South Korea. Mammalia 65:451–459. Google Scholar

4.

Y. Kawamura, T. Kamei, and H. Taruno . 1989. Middle and late Pleistocene mammalian faunas in Japan. The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki Kenkyu) 28:317–326. in Japanese with English abstract. Google Scholar

5.

Y. Kawamura and T. Sotsuka . 1984. Preliminary report on the Quaternary mammalian remains from several caves on the Hiraodai Plateau, Fukuoka Prefecture, Northern Kyushu, Japan. Bull Kitakyushu Mus Nat Hist 5:163–188. In Japanese with English summary. Google Scholar

6.

S. Ohdachi, R. Masuda, H. Abe, J. Adachi, N. E. Dokuchaev, V. Haukisalmi, and M. C. Yoshida . 1997. Phylogeny of Eurasian soricine shrews (Insectivora, Mammalia) inferred from the mitochondrial cyto-chrome b gene sequences. Zool Sci 14:527–532. Google Scholar

7.

S. Ohdachi, N. E. Dokuchaev, M. Hasegawa, and R. Masuda . 2001. Intraspecific phylogeny and geographic variation of six species of northeastern Asiatic Sorex shrews based on the mitochondrial cytochrome b sequences. Mol Ecol 10:2199–2213. Google Scholar

8.

D. Posada and K. A. Crandall . 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818. Google Scholar

9.

K. Strimmer and A. von Haeseler . 1996. Quartet puzzling: a quartet maximum-likelihood method for reconstructing tree topologies. Mol Biol Evol 13:964–969. Google Scholar

10.

D. Swofford 2000. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates. Sunder-land, Massachusetts. Google Scholar

11.

K. Tamura and M. Nei . 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 10:512–526. Google Scholar

12.

P. Vogel and T. S. Sofianidou . 1996. The shrews of the genus Crocidura on Lesbos, an eastern Mediterranean island. Bonn zool Beitr 46:339–347. Google Scholar

13.

Z. Yang 1996. Among-site rate variation and its impact on phylogenetic analyses. Trends Ecol Evol 11:367–372. Google Scholar
Satoshi D. Ohdachi, Hisashi Abe, and Sang-Hoon Han "Phylogenetical Positions of Sorex sp. (Insectivora, Mammalia) from Cheju Island and S. caecutiens from the Korean Peninsula, Inferred from Mitochondrial Cytochrome b Gene Sequences," Zoological Science 20(1), 91-95, (1 January 2003). https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.20.91
Received: 8 July 2002; Accepted: 1 September 2002; Published: 1 January 2003
JOURNAL ARTICLE
5 PAGES


SHARE
ARTICLE IMPACT
Back to Top