Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 1998 Activation of the 20S Proteasome of Xenopus Oocytes by SDS: Evidence for the Substrate-Induced Conformational Change Characteristic of Trypsin-Like Peptidase
Shinpei Yamada, Kentaro Sato, Junko Yamada, Masumi Yasutomi, Toshinobu Tokumoto, Katsutoshi Ishikawa
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The 20S proteasome of eukaryotic cells has at least three distinct peptidase activities (trypsin-like, chymotrypsin-like and peptidylglutamylpeptide (PGP) hydrolase activities). These peptidases are latent and require appropriate activators. SDS has been widely used as an activator of these peptidases, but the mechanism of its activation remains unresolved. In this study, we investigated the kinetics of the SDS-activated hydrolysis of the above three types of peptidase of the 20S proteasome purified from Xenopus oocytes. When the reaction was started by simultaneous adding both SDS and substrate, maximal rates of hydrolysis were reached after appreciable lag phases with the trypsin-type substrate [t-butyloxycarbonylLeu-Arg-Arg-4-methylcoumaryl-7-amide (Boc-LRR-MCA)], but no such lag phases were observed with the chymotrypsin-type and PGP hydrolase-type substrates [succinyl-Leu-Leu-Val-Tyr-4-methylcoumaryl-7-amide (Suc-LLVY-MCA), and benzyloxycarbonyl-Leu-Leu-Glu-2-naphthylamide (Cbz-LLE-2NA), respectively]. Similarly, changes in the hydrolysis rate to a reduced level upon dilution of SDS occurred after an appreciable lag phase again in the trypsin-like peptidase, but not in the other types. The lag phase characteristic of the trypsin-like peptidase was dependent on the substrate concentration. Thus, the lag phase was less discernible at very low concentrations of the substrate (e.g. at concentrations in the order of 1/100 of the Km value), but became more conspicuous with the increases in the substrate concentration. This lag phase also vanished upon preincubation of the activator (SDS) for a short period of 5 sec. These results suggest that the formation of the enzyme-substrate complex in the trypsin-like reaction induces a conformational change in the enzyme which makes the SDS activator site(s) in an occluded form, reducing the rates of SDS binding and dissociation.

INTRODUCTION

The proteasome is an intracellular multicatalytic protein-ase that is distributed in all eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells. In eukaryotic cells, degradation of most intracellular proteins are catalyzed by the enzyme that accounts for up to 1% of the total cell proteins (Coux et al., 1996; Baumeister et al., 1997; Goldberg et al., 1997). The enzyme (26S proteasome, 2000 kDa) which degrades ubiquitinated proteins in an ATP-dependent manner, is constructed by a 20S proteasome (700 kDa) that has several types of peptidase activity and two 19S regulatory complexes that perform several types of ATPase (Hilt et al., 1996; Baumeister et al., 1997). The peptidase activities are located in the 20S proteasome that takes the form of a cylindrical particle, composed of 28 subunits arranged in a stack of four rings (Coux et al., 1996; Baumeister et al., 1997; Goldberg et al., 1997). The 20S proteasome of eukaryotes has at least three distinct endopeptidase activities involved in cleaving bonds on the carboxyl side of basic (trypsin-like peptidase), hydrophobic (chymotrypsin-like peptidase) and acidic (PGP hydrolase) amino acid residues (Hershko and Ciechanover, 1992; Rivett, 1993). In addition to these three types, there appear to be several other types of protein-degrading and peptidase activities (Djaballah and Rivett, 1992; Orlowski et al., 1993). The peptidase activities of the isolated 20S proteasome are extremely low without activators. It is postulated that the enzyme is regulated in situ by subunit-exchange, the 19S regulatory complex and PA28 activator, etc. (Coux et al., 1996; Goldberg et al., 1997). However, it is virtually impossible to perform kinetic studies of the enzyme activation by these putative regulators at the moment. Therefore, several exogenous activators, such as SDS, fatty acids, cardiolipin and polylysine have been used to obtain appreciable levels of peptidase activity. Among these, SDS has been widely used as the activator, but the reported results are contradictory: e.g., the activation by SDS is reversible (Tanaka et al., 1989; Arribas and Castaño, 1990) or irreversible (Dahlmann et al., 1993).

The aim of the present study is to elucidate the mechanisms by which the three types of peptidase activity of the 20S proteasome (trypsin-like, chymotrypsin-like, and PGP hydrolase) are activated by SDS. In this study, the activation of three peptidase activities by SDS were examined in detail by following the time-courses of hydrolysis. Here, we report that both acceleration and deceleration of the hydrolysis by SDS binding and dissociation occur after an appreciable lag phase in trypsin-like peptidase, but not in the chymotrypsin-like peptidase and PGP hydrolase. The lag phase increased with the increase of the substrate concentration. We propose that the trypsin-like peptidase reaction is mediated by the substrate-induced conformational change of the enzyme.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials

Cbz-LLE-2NA and 2-naphthylamide (2NA) were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Suc-LLVY-MCA, Boc-LRR-MCA, tbutyloxycarbonyl-Gln-Ala-Arg-4-methylcoumaryl-7-amide (Boc-QARMCA), t-butyloxycarbonyl-Phe-Ser-Arg-4-methylcoumaryl-7-amide (Boc-FSR-MCA), and 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin (AMC) were purchased from Peptide Institute (Osaka, Japan). These fluorogenic peptides were dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and used. Sepharose CL-6B, phenyl-Sepharose CL-4B and Mono Q were from Pharmacia (Uppsala, Sweden), DEAE-cellulose (DE52-cellulose) was from Whatman (Maidstone, UK) and hydroxylapatite was from Wako Pure Chemical (Osaka, Japan). All other reagents used were of analytical grade.

Purification of 20S proteasome

The 20S proteasome was prepared from Xenopus oocytes as described previously with slight modifications (Yamada et al., 1998). The ovaries of adult Xenopus (10–15) were washed three times with 200 ml of 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 20% glycerol, 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol and 1 mM EDTA (TGME buffer), and then centrifuged in minimum volumes of the TGME buffer (100,000 × g, 50 min) (Tokumoto and Ishikawa, 1993). The supernatant was centrifuged again at 20,000 × g for 30 min to remove lipoid materials and the resultant clear supernatant (∼5 ml) was applied to a Sepharose CL-6B column (2.7 × 98 cm) in TGME buffer. The fractions with SucLLVY-MCA-hydrolyzing activity (active fractions) were pooled and applied again to a DE52-cellulose column (1.6 × 10 cm) in TGME buffer containing 100 mM KCl. The column was washed with the same buffer and then eluted with a linear gradient of 100–300 mM KCl in TGME buffer. The active fractions were collected, diluted to 100 mM KCl by adding TGME buffer and applied to a second DE52-cellulose column (1.2 × 4 cm). This column was washed with TGME buffer containing 100 mM KCl, and eluted with a linear gradient of 100–300 mM KCl in TGME buffer. The active fractions were pooled, diluted and concentrated through a Mono Q column (HR 5/5) equilibrated with TGME buffer. The Mono Q column was washed with TGME buffer containing 100 mM KCl, and eluted with a linear gradient of 100–300 mM KCl in TGME buffer. The active fractions were dialyzed against 5 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.6) containing 20% glycerol, 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol and 1 mM EDTA. The dialysate was applied to a column (1.6 × 10 cm) of hydroxylapatite equilibrated with the same buffer, and elution was conducted with a linear gradient of potassium phosphate (pH 7.6) (5–350 mM, 300 ml). The active fractions were dialyzed against TGME buffer, and the dialysate was applied again to a Mono Q column (HR 5/5) equilibrated with TGME buffer and eluted with a linear gradient of KCl in TGME buffer (0–350 mM KCl, 40 ml). Several mg of 20S proteasome were purified in these procedures. To examine the purity and the subunit composition of the 20S proteasome, the active fraction was subjected to non-denaturing- and SDS-PAGEs (Laemmli, 1970; Yamada et al., 1995). The sample was stored at −85°C and used within 6 months.

Enzyme assays

The activity of various peptidases was determined as described previously with slight modifications (Yamada et al., 1998). Reactions were carried out at 37°C in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.5) containing 1.5 or 2.9 μg/ml 20S proteasome, with or without 0.06% SDS, 0.2–500 μM peptidyl substrate, 10% DMSO and 1 mM EDTA. The reaction of peptidyl substrate hydrolysis was started by adding peptidyl substrate which was dissolved in DMSO. The SDS resolved in reaction solution was added to the enzyme solution before, concomitant with or after the starting of the peptidase reaction which was carried out in reaction solution containing Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.5), 20S proteasome, peptidyl substrate, DMSO and EDTA (total volumes of 0.2–5.0 ml). At appropriate times, 0.1 or 0.2 ml of the reaction solution was mixed with an equal volume of 1% SDS solution to stop the reaction and the mixture was diluted to 2.2 ml with 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 9.0). Then, the AMC or 2NA liberated during the reaction was measured fluorometrically (380 nm excitation/460 nm emission for AMC and 335 nm excitation/410 nm emission for 2NA) with a fluorescence spectrophotometer (F-3000, Hitachi, Japan). The activity of peptidyl substrate hydrolysis was presented as nmol of substrate hydrolyzed per mg protein of 20S proteasome (Yamada et al., 1995).

Protein concentration

Protein concentration was determined by the method of Bradford (1976) with bovine serum albumin as a standard. The concentration of the 20S proteasome of Xenopus oocytes was calculated from the absorbance at 280 nm, an assuming E1cm1% value of 12.3 (Tanaka et al., 1988).

RESULTS

SDS has been widely used as a common activator of various peptidases of the 20S proteasome (Tanaka et al., 1989; Kinoshita et al., 1990; Pereira et al., 1992; Ozaki et al., 1992), but little is known about the mechanism of its action. In the present study, we used SDS as the activator of three types of peptidase (trypsin-like, chymotrypsin-like, and PGP hydro-lase) using the fluorogenic substrate peptides specific to each of these peptidases. The concentration of SDS used in this study, 0.06%, was chosen since it produced about maximal activation of all of these peptidases under the conditions used (Yamada et al., 1995; Watanabe and Yamada, 1996).

In the experiment shown in Fig. 1 peptidase reactions were started by adding Suc-LLVY-MCA (Fig. 1A) and BocLRR-MCA (Fig. 1B) and SDS at the same time to the enzyme solution, and the peptide hydrolysis was followed for 5 min (1st phase). Then, the SDS concentration was reduced to 0.03% to examine the effects of dilution on the hydrolysis rate (2nd phase), and the SDS concentration was increased back to 0.06% to follow the subsequent reaction (3rd phase). As shown in Fig. 1A, chymotrypsin-like hydrolysis proceeded at a constant rate immediately after the start of the reaction. Upon dilution of SDS in the 2nd phase, the hydrolysis rate was reduced instantly to a new rate, and the increase of SDS to the original concentration (0.06%) in the 3rd phase resulted in an instant increase to a new rate, which was approximately identical to the rate in the 1st phase. Essentially the same result was obtained with PGP hydrolase-type substrate Cbz-LLE-2NA (data are not shown to avoid redundancy).

Fig. 1

Characteristic appearance of the lag phases in the SDS-activated hydrolysis of the trypsin-type substrate. Reactions were carried out initially in a total volume of 5.0 ml containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.5, 2.9 μg/ml 20S proteasome, 0.06% SDS, 100 μM Suc-LLVYMCA (LLVY; A), or 10 μM Boc-LRR-MCA (LRR; B), 1 mM EDTA and 10% DMSO. Reactions were started by adding Suc-LLVY-MCA (A) or Boc-LRR-MCA (B) and SDS solutions which were containing other components of the reaction solution to the enzyme solution. At 5 min after the start of the reaction, an equal volume of the same reaction solution without SDS and the enzyme was added. Furthermore, at 11 min (A) or 13 min (B) after starting the reaction, a small volume of the same reaction solution but with a higher concentration of SDS and no enzyme was added to adjust the SDS concentration back to 0.06%. Reactions were stopped by adding 100 μl of the reaction solutions to 100 μl of 1% SDS solution at various times. Similar results were obtained in individual assays in 10 or more separate experiments.

i0289-0003-15-3-353-f01.gif

In contrast to the two types of peptidases, if Boc-LRRMCA was used as the substrate there was an appreciable lag period at each phase of the SDS modulated reactions described above (Fig. 1B). Interestingly, the enzyme activation by 0.06% SDS that was added together with the substrate took place after a lag period of about 30 to 40 sec as determined by extrapolation of the linear portion of the time-course to the abscissa. Alternatively, dilution of SDS (2nd phase) produced a reduction of the hydrolysis rate after a delay period, during which time the higher rate of hydrolysis that had been obtained with 0.06% SDS continued for a while. The increase of the SDS concentration (3rd phase) produced an acceleration in hydrolysis again after an appreciable lag period. Quite similar time courses with lag periods were obtained in the reactions of other trypsin-like substrates, Boc-FSR-MCA and Boc-QAR-MCA (data are not shown). These results suggest that the mechanism by which SDS modulates the peptidase activities of the proteasome is distinctly different between the two groups of peptidase: (a) chymotrypsin-like and PGP hydrolase activities, and (b) trypsin-like activity. The results also suggest a hypothesis that the putative modulator site(s) become less accessible to the binding and dissociation of SDS upon the binding of the trypsin-type substrate to the enzyme.

In order to investigate the above hypothesis, the effects of SDS preincubation which is carried out in the absence of substrate on the lag period were examined in Fig. 2. When SDS was added together with the substrate under the same reaction conditions as for Fig. 1B, a similar lag period of about 30 sec was observed. Therefore, the lag phase completely disappeared due to SDS preincubation for 2 min, and preincubation for as short as 5 sec was found to be sufficient to eliminate the lag period (Fig. 2). Furthermore, in order to examine the above hypothesis, we carried out trypsin-like peptidase reactions using various concentrations of the substrate Boc-LRR-MCA in the presence of 0.06% SDS (Fig. 3A–C). In these experiments, we compared two different modes of addition of SDS at each concentration of the substrate: (1) the addition of SDS together with the substrate, and (2) the addition of SDS at 2 min before the substrate. At low concentrations of the substrate (0.2 μM Boc-LRR-MCA), there was virtually no difference in the kinetics of hydrolysis regardless of the mode of addition (Fig. 3A). At higher concentrations of the substrate (20 and 100 μM), however, the kinetics became distinctly different depending upon the mode of addition. Namely, the lag period became clearly discernible when SDS was added together with the substrate. As clearly seen here, the extent of delay (i.e. the size of lag period) increased with the increase of substrate concentration (Figs. 1B, 2 and 3A–C). On chymotrypsin-like and PGP hydrolase activities at the high concentrations of substrate (e.g. 500 μM Suc-LLVY-MCA and 500 μM Cbz-LLE-2NA; about Km values, data are not shown) the lag periods in the reaction were examined in Fig. 4. As seen in the figure, no appreciable lag phases were detected.

Fig. 2

Disappearance of the lag phase by preincubation of SDS for a short period. Reaction conditions were the same as for Fig. 1B except that the time for SDS addition is different. 0.06% SDS was added at 2 min before (○), 5 sec before (▵) or the same time with (◊) the start of the reaction which is initiated by adding a small volume (1/100 of reaction solution) of the same reaction solution but with a higher concentration of Boc-LRR-MCA (LRR; final concentration of 10 μM).

i0289-0003-15-3-353-f02.gif

Fig. 3

Dependence of the size of lag period on the concentration of trypsin-type substrate. Reactions were carried out under the same conditions as for Fig. 1B, except that 1.5 μg/ml 20S proteasome and various concentrations of Boc-LRR-MCA as shown in the figure were included: (A) Reactions were started by adding 0.2 μM substrate BocLRR-MCA. 0.06% SDSs were added to the enzyme solution at 2 min before (○) or at the same time with (▵) starting the reaction. The dotted line shows the time-course of the hydrolysis in the absence of SDS (average values from four independent experiments). (B and C) The reactions were carried out under the same condition as for (A) except that the substrate concentrations in the reaction solution were used as 20 μM (B) and 100 μM (C) Boc-LRR-MCA (LRR): (○), SDS preincubation for 2 min; (▵), SDS added at the same time with the start of reaction.

i0289-0003-15-3-353-f03.gif

Fig. 4

Undetectable lag phase in the reaction with high concentration of substrates Suc-LLVY-MCA and Cbz-LLE-2NA. Reaction conditions were the same as for Fig. 1 except that the substrate and the concentration were different. Reactions were started by simultaneous addition of SDS and substrate solutions: (○), 500 μM Suc-LLVY-MCA (LLVY); (▵), 500 μM Cbz-LLE-2NA (LLE).

i0289-0003-15-3-353-f04.gif

DISCUSSION

The 20S proteasome is a multi-catalytic proteinase, and the three major peptidase activities (trypsin-like, chymotrypsin-like and PGP hydrolase) have been investigated using the peptidase-specific fluorogenic substrate peptides whose hydrolysis results in high fluorescent products. However, all of these peptidase activities are latent, and require appropriate activators such as SDS, fatty acids, cardiolipin and polylysine. Among these activators, SDS was most frequently used in the literature. Although there is a general consensus that SDS serves as an activator of several peptidases, many important questions remain unresolved especially as to whether common or differentiated mechanisms are operating for the activation of the different types of peptidase described above.

One of the most important aspects of the present study is the finding that both acceleration and deceleration of the trypsin-like hydrolysis by SDS binding and dissociation occur after appreciable delays. There are no such delays in the chymotrypsin-like peptidase and PGP hydrolase reactions. These results suggest that the substrate-induced conformational change of the enzyme characteristic of the trypsin-like peptidase is involved in the peculiar mode of SDS activation of this particular peptidase. This notion is supported by the following pieces of evidence. First, the extent of delay in the activation by SDS (viz. the size of the lag period) increased considerably with the increase of the substrate concentration. This indicates that the formation of the enzyme-substrate complex induces a conformational change in the enzyme which makes the activator site(s) in an occluded form, reducing the rate of SDS binding to the site(s). This mechanism is also supported by the present observation that the deceleration of the hydrolysis by dilution of the enzyme-bound SDS occurred after the appreciable delay (Fig. 1B). As shown in the preincubation experiments, treatment of the enzyme with SDS for a short period before the substrate addition eliminates the delay of activation, indicating that the activator site(s) is readily accessible to SDS before the substrate addition, viz. prior to the substrate-induced enzyme conformational change. Since SDS instantly activates the chymotrypsin-like and PGP hydrolase activities regardless of the sequence of addition, we propose that the trypsin-like peptidase reaction is mediated by the conformational change mechanism specifically involved in this particular type of peptidase.

In conclusion, the modes of action of the widely used activator of the 20S proteasome, SDS, were investigated using the fluorogenic substrate peptides specific to the three major types of peptidase. The present studies have revealed new conformational change in the enzyme involved in the SDS-activated peptidase reactions. The trypsin-like peptidase reaction is mediated by the substrate-induced conformational change characteristic of this particular peptidase which can be characterized by an occlusion phenomenon of the activator site(s).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan and grants from the Saito-Chion Foundation, Shizuoka, Japan.

REFERENCES

1.

J. Arribas and J. G. Castaño . 1990. Kinetic studies of the differential effect of detergents on the peptidase activities of the multicatalytic proteinase from rat liver. J Biol Chem 265:13969–13973. Google Scholar

2.

W. Baumeister, Z. Cejka, M. Kania, and E. Seemuller . 1997. The proteasome: A macromolecular assembly designed to confine proteolysis to a nanocompartment. Biol Chem 378:121–130. Google Scholar

3.

M. M. Bradford 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:249–254. Google Scholar

4.

O. Coux, K. Tanaka, and A. L. Goldberg . 1996. Structure and functions of the 20S and 26S proteasomes. Annu Rev Biochem 65:801–847. Google Scholar

5.

B. Dahlmann, B. Becher, A. Sobek, C. Ehlers, F. Kopp, and L. Kuehn . 1993. In vitro activation of the 20S proteasome. Enzyme Protein 47:274–284. Google Scholar

6.

H. Djaballah and A. J. Rivett . 1992. Peptidylglutamyl-peptide hydrolase activity of the multicatalytic proteinase complex: Evidence for a new high-affinity site, analysis of cooperative kinetics, and the effect of manganese ions. Biochemistry 31:4133–4141. Google Scholar

7.

A. L. Goldberg, T. N. Akopian, A. F. Kisselev, D. H. Lee, and M. Rohrwild . 1997. New insights into the mechanisms and importance of the proteasome in intracellular protein degradation. Biol Chem 378:131–140. Google Scholar

8.

A. Hershko and A. Ciechanover . 1992. The ubiquitin system for protein degradation. Annu Rev Biochem 61:761–807. Google Scholar

9.

W. Hilt, W. Heinemeyer, and D. H. Wolf . 1996. The proteasome and protein degradation in yeast. Adv Exp Med Biol 389:197–202. Google Scholar

10.

M. Kinoshita, T. Hamakubo, I. Fukui, T. Murachi, and H. Toyohara . 1990. Significant amount of multicatalytic proteinase identified on membrane from human erythrocyte. J Biochem 107:440–444. Google Scholar

11.

U. K. Laemmli 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685. Google Scholar

12.

M. Orlowski, C. Cardozo, and C. Michaud . 1993. Evidence for the presence of five distinct proteolytic components in the pituitary multicatalytic proteinase complex. Properties of two components cleaving bonds on the carboxyl site of branched chain and small neutral amino acids. Biochemistry 32:1563–1572. Google Scholar

13.

M. Ozaki, K. Fujinami, K. Tanaka, Y. Amemiya, T. Sato, N. Ogura, and H. Nakagawa . 1992. Purification and initial characterization of the proteasome from the higher plant Spinacia oleracea. J Biol Chem 267:21678–21684. Google Scholar

14.

M. E. Pereira, B. Yu, and S. Wilk . 1992. Enzymatic changes of the bovine pituitary multicatalytic proteinase complex, induced by magnesium ions. Arch Biochem Biophys 294:1–8. Google Scholar

15.

A. J. Rivett 1993. Proteasomes: multicatalytic proteinase complexes. Biochem J 291:1–10. Google Scholar

16.

K. Tanaka, T. Yoshimura, A. Kumatori, A. Ichihara, A. Ikai, M. Nishigai, K. Kameyama, and T. Takagi . 1988. Proteasomes (multi-protease complexes) as 20S ring-shaped particles in a variety of eukaryotic cells. J Biol Chem 263:16209–16217. Google Scholar

17.

K. Tanaka, T. Yoshimura, and A. Ichihara . 1989. Role of substrate in reversible activation of proteasomes (multi-protease complex) by sodium dodecyl sulfate. J Biochem 106:495–500. Google Scholar

18.

T. Tokumoto and K. Ishikawa . 1993. A novel “active” form of proteasomes from Xenopus laevis ovary cytosol. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 192:1106–1114. Google Scholar

19.

N. Watanabe and S. Yamada . 1996. Activation of 20S proteasomes from spinach leaves by fatty acids. Plant Cell Physiol 37:147–151. Google Scholar

20.

S. Yamada, K. Hojo, H. Yoshimura, and K. Ishikawa . 1995. Reaction of 20S proteasome: Shift of SDS-dependent activation profile by diva-lent cations. J Biochem 117:1162–1169. Google Scholar

21.

S. Yamada, J. Yamada, K. Sato, T. Tokumoto, M. Yasutomi, and K. Ishikawa . 1998. Irreversible potent activation and reversible inhibition of trypsin-like activity of 20S proteasome purified from Xenopus oocytes by fatty acid. Zool Sci 15:43–49. Google Scholar
Shinpei Yamada, Kentaro Sato, Junko Yamada, Masumi Yasutomi, Toshinobu Tokumoto, and Katsutoshi Ishikawa "Activation of the 20S Proteasome of Xenopus Oocytes by SDS: Evidence for the Substrate-Induced Conformational Change Characteristic of Trypsin-Like Peptidase," Zoological Science 15(3), 353-357, (1 June 1998). https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.15.353
Received: 11 December 1997; Accepted: 1 March 1998; Published: 1 June 1998
Back to Top